Changes in Multiple Aspects of Pain Outcomes After Rehabilitation: Analysis of Pain Data in a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effects of Adding Sensorimotor Training to Manual Therapy and Exercise for Chronic Neck Pain.

OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in pain outcomes to fully evaluate the effect of adding sensorimotor training to manual therapy and exercise in patients with chronic neck pain and sensorimotor deficits. Concordance was examined between pain distribution and pain intensity and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Participants (n=152) were randomly allocated into 4 intervention groups: One group received local neck treatment (NT) comprising manual therapy and exercise and the other 3 groups received additional sensorimotor training (either joint position sense/oculomotor exercises, balance exercises or both). Treatment was delivered twice a week for 6 weeks. Pain and patient-reported outcomes were measured at baseline, posttreatment, and 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: There were greater changes in pain location, extent, and intensity at 6- and 12-month follow-ups in the sensorimotor training groups compared with the NT group ( P <0.05). A greater number of patients in the sensorimotor training groups gained ≥50% reduction in pain extent and intensity relative to the NT group at 6 and 12 months ( P <0.05). Clinical improvement in pain extent was concordant with pain intensity (adjusted kappa=056 to 0.66, %agreement=78.3 to 82.9, P <0.001) and disability (adjusted kappa=0.47 to 0.58, % agreement=73.7 to 79.0, P <0.01) at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups, but not with function and well-being. The concordance tended to decline with time. DISCUSSION: Multiple aspects of the pain experience improved in the longer term by adding sensorimotor training to NT for patients with neck pain and sensorimotor deficits. The concordance between pain and patient-reported outcomes was not always evident and varied over time, suggesting the need for multidimensional assessments of pain.

Stimulated cervical afferent input increases postural instability in older people with chronic neck pain: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Several potential causes can impair balance in older people. The neck torsion maneuver may be useful in demonstrating impaired balance caused by the stimulation of cervical proprioceptive input. Whereas evidence suggests impaired standing balance in older people with chronic neck pain, balance impairment during the neck torsion position and its relationship with clinical characteristics have not yet been investigated in this population. The aims of this study were to investigate whether the neck torsion position could significantly influence balance responses in older people with chronic non-specific neck pain and to determine the relationships between the balance responses and characteristics of neck pain. METHODS: Sixty-eight older people (34 with chronic non-specific neck pain and 34 controls) participated in the study. Balance was tested using a force plate during comfortable stance with eyes open under four conditions: neutral head on a firm surface, neutral head on a soft surface, neck torsion to left and right on a firm surface and neck torsion to left and right on a soft surface. Balance outcomes were anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) displacements, sway area and velocity. Characteristics of neck pain were intensity, duration and disability. RESULTS: Overall, the neck pain group exhibited greater AP and ML displacements, sway area and velocity in the neck torsion position on firm and soft surfaces compared to controls (partial eta squared (η²p) = 0.06-0.15, p < 0.05). The neck pain group also had greater AP displacement, sway area and velocity in the neutral position on a soft surface compared to controls (η²p = 0.09-0.16, p < 0.05). For both groups, the neck torsion position displayed overall greater postural sway compared to the neutral position (η²p = 0.16-0.69, p < 0.05). There were no relationships between the postural sway outcomes and characteristics of neck pain (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The neck torsion maneuver, stimulating the receptors resulted in increased postural sway in older people, with a more pronounced effect in those with neck pain. The study provides evidence supporting the use of neck torsion for assessing impaired balance related to abnormal cervical input in older people with chronic non-specific neck pain.

A cluster analysis of cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in persons with nonspecific neck pain.

INTRODUCTION: Inter-individual variability may contribute to impaired cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility (CKS) in patients with nonspecific neck pain. OBJECTIVES: To identify subgroups of participants with nonspecific neck pain based on cervical joint position errors (JPEs) and to determine potential factors associated with identified subgroups. METHODS: One hundred participants with nonspecific neck pain (unidentified pathoanatomical cause) and 50 controls were recruited. JPEs were measured in cervical extension and rotation, using a laser pointer. JPEs were expressed as absolute (AEs), constant (CEs), and variable (VEs) errors. Clinical characteristics were pain intensity, duration, disability, side of pain, dizziness, psychological features, and range of motion. All tests were performed within 1 day. A cluster analysis was conducted based on AEs. A logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the cluster groups. RESULTS: Analysis divided neck pain participants into two groups: cluster 1 with greater impaired CKS (n = 36) and cluster 2 with lesser impaired CKS (n = 64). The AEs (all cervical movements) and CE (left rotation) were larger in cluster 1 than 2 (p ≤ .002). Overall, participants in clusters 1 and 2 had larger AEs, CEs, and VEs than controls (p ≤ .04). The presence of dizziness was a risk factor associated with cluster 1 (OR=2.5, p = .04). The other characteristics were not associated with the cluster groups (p ≥ .09). CONCLUSION: The AEs identified two subgroups of patients with nonspecific neck pain. Participants in subgroup 1 had greater impaired CKS, and participants in subgroup 2 had lesser impaired CKS. Dizziness was a potential risk factor associated with greater impaired CKS.

Effects of manual therapy combined with therapeutic exercise versus routine physical therapy on brain biomarkers in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain in Thailand: a study protocol for a single-blinded randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Structural brain alterations in pain-related areas have been demonstrated in patients with non-specific neck pain. While manual therapy combined with therapeutic exercise is an effective management for neck pain, its underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. The primary objective of this trial is to investigate the effects of manual therapy combined with therapeutic exercise on grey matter volume and thickness in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. The secondary objectives are to assess changes in white matter integrity, neurochemical biomarkers, clinical features of neck pain, cervical range of motion and cervical muscle strength. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Fifty-two participants with chronic non-specific neck pain will be recruited into the study. Participants will be randomly allocated to either an intervention or control group (1:1 ratio). Participants in the intervention group will receive manual therapy combined with therapeutic exercise for 10 weeks (two visits per week). The control group will receive routine physical therapy. Primary outcomes are whole-brain and regional grey matter volume and thickness. Secondary outcomes are white matter integrity (fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity), neurochemical biomarkers (N-acetylaspartate, creatine, glutamate/glutamine, myoinositol and choline), clinical features (neck pain intensity, duration, neck disability and psychological symptoms), cervical range of motion and cervical muscle strength. All outcome measures will be taken at baseline and postintervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval of this study has been granted by Faculty of Associated Medical Science, Chiang Mai University. The results of this trial will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05568394.

Effectiveness of adding rehabilitation of cervical related sensorimotor control to manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Local neck treatments and sensorimotor training can improve cervical proprioception and balance, but it remains unclear what treatments and treatment combination achieve the best outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the most effective interventions to improve disturbances in joint position sense (JPS) and balance and their effects on neck pain, dizziness and related features in the short- and long-terms. DESIGN: 2x2 factorial, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Participants with neck pain (n = 152) were randomly allocated to one of four intervention groups: i) local neck treatment (NT), ii) NT + JPS/oculomotor exercises (JPS/OC), iii) NT + balance exercises, and iv) all treatments. Participants received 12 treatments over 6 weeks. Primary outcomes were postural sway and joint position error. Secondary outcomes included gait speed, dizziness, pain intensity and disability, cervical range of motion, functional ability, and quality of life. Outcome measures were taken at baseline, posttreatment and 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: All four interventions resulted in short- and long-term improvements in primary and secondary outcomes with medium to large effect sizes, but JPS and balance in neck torsion improved most with the addition of a combined program of JPS/OC + balance exercises to NT while balance in neck neutral improved most with the addition of balance exercises. Adding sensorimotor training was also more effective in maintaining levels of improvement in neck pain and disability at 6- and 12-months. Effect sizes of additional treatment benefits were medium to large. CONCLUSIONS: Adding specific training of JPS/OC and balance to NT best addresses deficits in cervical proprioception and balance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: xxxxx.

Pain-side related difference in cross-sectional area of the longus colli muscle and its relationship with standing balance in persons with non-specific neck pain.

BACKGROUND: Longus colli muscle has a significant role in postural control. A reduction of longus colli cross-sectional area (CSA) has been demonstrated in neck pain patients. However, pain-side related difference and its relationship with clinical features and standing balance remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate side-to-side difference in the longus colli CSA and to determine the relationships of the CSA with clinical characteristics and standing balance in neck pain patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty participants with chronic non-specific neck pain (20 unilateral and 30 bilateral) were recruited. CSA of the longus colli muscle was measured using ultrasound imaging. Balance was measured using a force platform during a narrow stance with eyes open, eyes closed, and neck torsion (left and right). Balance outcomes were sway area and displacement in anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) directions. Clinical characteristics were neck pain intensity, disability, and duration. RESULTS: The longus colli CSA was reduced on the painful side in patients with unilateral neck pain (p < 0.01). There was a trend towards reduced CSA on the more painful side in those with bilateral neck pain (p = 0.08). The reduced CSA was mostly correlated with the greater AP sway displacement and sway area (r ranged from -0.27 to -0.54, p < 0.05). The longus colli CSA was not correlated with pain intensity, disability, and duration (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The longus colli CSA was reduced on the painful side of neck pain. The reduced CSA was correlated with impaired standing balance, but not with clinical characteristics of neck pain.

Altered neuromuscular activity and postural stability during standing balance tasks in persons with non-specific neck pain.

OBJECTIVES: To compare neck, trunk, and lower extremity muscle activity in standing in persons with neck pain (NP) to healthy controls and determine associations with postural sway. METHODS: Participants included 25 persons with NP and 25 controls. Surface electromyography was recorded bilaterally from neck (sternocleidomastoid, SCM; splenius capitis, SC; upper trapezius, UT), trunk (erector spinae, ES), and lower extremity (rectus femoris, RF; biceps femoris, BF; tibialis anterior, TA; medial gastrocnemius, GN) muscles. Postural sway was measured using a force platform in narrow stance with eyes open/closed, on firm/soft surfaces. RESULTS: Compared to controls, the NP group demonstrated higher activity in all muscles, except UT and had higher amplitude ratios for neck muscles (SCM, SC) for all tasks (p < .05). No between-group difference was found in amplitude ratios for lower extremity muscles, except for GN. Lower extremity activity was moderately correlated with larger postural sway for both groups (r = 0.41-0.66, p < .05). There were no correlations between sway and neck and trunk muscle activity (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Increased muscle activity with NP is associated with increased postural sway. Both groups used similar postural control strategies, but the increased neck activity in the NP group is likely related to the NP disorder rather than postural instability.

Effects of tandem walk and cognitive and motor dual- tasks on gait speed in individuals with chronic idiopathic neck pain: a preliminary study.

Introduction: Gait impairment has been associated with neck pain. It is relevant to understand the possible influence of narrow-based walk and an attention-demanding secondary task on gait performance in neck pain.Purpose: To investigate the effects of tandem walk and cognitive and motor dual-tasks on gait speed in persons with chronic idiopathic neck pain (CINP) compared with controls.Methods: A cross-sectional study. Thirty participants with CINP and 30 asymptomatic controls participated in the study. Gait speed was assessed using a timed 10-m walk test at a comfortable pace under four conditions: (1) comfortable walk (as reference); (2) tandem walk (single task); (3) cognitive dual-task walking; and (4) motor dual-task walking. Dual-task interference was calculated.Results: There was no difference in comfortable gait speed between groups (p= 0.40). The CINP group had slower gait speed during the tandem walk than controls (p= 0.02). The dual-task interference on gait speed was not different between groups (p = 0.67 for cognitive, p = 0.93 for motor).Conclusion: Participants with CINP had impaired gait stability during tandem walk. An attention-demanding secondary task did not influence gait speed in individuals with CINP compared to controls. The study suggests that tandem walk could be considered as an assessment tool and part of rehabilitation for neck pain.

Profiling the Extent and Location of Pain in Migraine and Cervicogenic Headache: A Cross-sectional Single-Site Observational Study.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to quantify and compare the location and extent of pain in people with either episodic migraine, chronic migraine, or cervicogenic headache. A secondary aim was to examine the associations between pain extent and headache features, quality of life, and psychological distress for each headache type. DESIGN: A cross-sectional, single-site, observational study. SETTING: Headache outpatient clinic. SUBJECTS: From a sample of 390 patients, 114 patients with migraine or cervicogenic headache (48 episodic migraine, 30 chronic migraine, 36 cervicogenic headache) were eligible for the study. METHODS: Pain location and extent were determined using a novel approach for digital pain drawing acquisition and analysis. Headache features included intensity and history duration. Quality of life was measured using the SF-36 and psychological distress using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: Overall, pain was most frequently reported in the frontal and temporal regions in patients with either episodic or chronic migraine, whereas pain was most frequent in the suboccipital region in patients with cervicogenic headache. A larger pain extent was moderately correlated with higher headache intensity (rs = 0.53, P = 0.003) and poorer quality of life (rs ranged from -0.36 to -0.40, P < 0.05) in patients with chronic migraine, whereas pain extent was associated with longer headache duration in those with cervicogenic headache (rs = 0.35, P = 0.04). No correlation was found between pain extent and psychological features for any headache type (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite some differences, there was a large symptomatic overlap between headache types, highlighting the limitations of using pain location in the differential diagnosis of headache.

Impaired Standing Balance in Individuals with Cervicogenic Headache and Migraine.

AIMS: To determine whether a difference in standing balance exists among individuals with cervicogenic headache, those with migraine, and asymptomatic controls. METHODS: A total of 24 participants with cervicogenic headache, 24 with migraine, and 24 asymptomatic controls of similar age, gender, and body mass index were included. Standing balance was assessed with a swaymeter under the conditions of eyes open and closed; on firm and soft surfaces; and in comfortable and narrow stances (for a total of eight testing conditions). Each condition was tested for 30 seconds. The outcome measures were sway area and displacement. Multivariate analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc test were used to analyze between-group differences in the postural sway variables. RESULTS: Both headache groups had significantly larger sway areas than the control group during comfortable stance with eyes open and with eyes closed on a soft surface (P < .05) and during narrow stance with eyes closed on firm and soft surfaces (P < .05). The overall results demonstrated significantly greater sway in the anterior-posterior direction and less sway in the medial-lateral direction in selected tests in the cervicogenic headache group compared to the migraine group. CONCLUSION: Individuals with cervicogenic headache and those with migraine have impaired balance during standing, but possibly to a different extent and pattern. Assessment of balance in patients with cervicogenic headache and migraine should be considered in clinical practice.

Effects of local treatment with and without sensorimotor and balance exercise in individuals with neck pain: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Impaired cervical joint position sense and balance are associated with neck pain. Specific therapeutic exercise and manual therapy are effective for improving neck pain and functional ability but their effects on joint position sense and balance impairments remain uncertain. Changes in the joint position sense and balance may need to be addressed specifically. The primary objective is to investigate the most effective interventions to improve impaired cervical joint position sense and balance in individuals with neck pain. The secondary objective is to assess the effectiveness of the interventions on pain intensity and disability, pain location, dizziness symptoms, cervical range of motion, gait speed, functional ability, treatment satisfaction and quality of life. METHODS: A 2 × 2 factorial, single blind RCT with immediate, short- and long-term follow-ups. One hundred and sixty eight participants with neck pain with impaired joint position sense and balance will be recruited into the trial. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of four intervention groups: i) local neck treatment, ii) local treatment plus tailored sensorimotor exercises, iii) local treatment plus balance exercises, and iv) local treatment plus sensorimotor and balance exercises. Participants receive two treatments for 6 weeks. Primary outcomes are postural sway and cervical joint position error. Secondary outcomes include gait speed, dizziness intensity, neck pain intensity, neck disability, pain extent and location, cervical range of motion, functional ability, perceived benefit, and quality of life. Assessment will be measured at baseline, immediately after treatment and at 3, 6, 12 month-follow ups. DISCUSSION: Neck pain is one of the major causes of disability. Effective treatment must address not only the symptoms but the dysfunctions associated with neck pain. This trial will evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for individuals with neck pain with impaired cervical joint position sense and balance. This trial will impact on clinical practice by providing evidence towards optimal and efficient management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03149302 ). May 10, 2017.